Learning to thrive in the new life Jesus offers us – 2 Corinthians 5:16-17

Who is the “head”?

Who is the head, Mary Kassian?

Mary Kassian posted a blog on the 1st of August (2012) entitled Sex in the Shadowlands that includes the diagram above. This diagram sends a faulty message. (Image used with permission.)  

I agree with Mary Kassian that the word “head” (kephalē) is used in the context of unity and oneness in the New Testament; however Mary and her diagram take the concept of “head” and unity further than Scripture does.

The diagram shows that the Lord God (presumably the Triune God) is the head of the incarnate Jesus Christ; that Jesus Christ is the head of the Church; and that a husband is the head of his wife. In the New Testament, God, Jesus Christ, and husbands/men are indeed called “heads”.

However the diagram also indicates that church elders and, as an aside on the far left, fathers are “heads”. There is no biblical basis for calling church elders or fathers “heads” in a New Testament Greek sense of the word.

The word “head” (kephalē) used in the Greek NT is not well understood, so I think it is unwise for us to use the word in ways that have no biblical basis.

One common misunderstanding is that the Greek word kephalē (“head”) means “authority”.[2] Rather than “authority”, kephalē is used as part of a head–body metaphor symbolising unity in verses such as Ephesians 5:23. In 1 Corinthians 11:3, however, it probably means “source” or “origin”.[3] In other NT verses kephalē is used with the metaphorical sense of “fullness“.

Here is a comment I left on Mary Kassian’s blog about the diagram. (It never got approved and comments are now closed.)

. . . on the left hand side it says, “Head (Father) of the house”. There is no Scripture which says that the father is the head of the house.  None.

Ephesians 5:23 does say that husband is the head of the wife. But it doesn’t say that the husband is the head of the household; it doesn’t even say that the husband, or father, is the head of the family. The head–body metaphor is one of unity, as has been pointed out—a profound, intimate unity that uniquely applies to husbands and wives, and not to fathers and households, etc.

I think we need to be careful that we don’t let an English understanding of “head” confuse what is being said in the Greek.  (I have yet to see kephalē–head mean “leader” or “ruler” in original, untranslated Classical or Koine Greek.)[2]

Also, the New Testament does not say that elders are the kephalē–head of the church community. Jesus Christ is the head of his Church. There is a unique and profound unity between Christ and his Church. [More about leadership in the community of God’s people here.]

I really think we need to keep to Scriptures when we use the word “head” metaphorically as there is a danger that we will lose the impact of the head–body metaphor if we start applying it in non–biblical ways to fathers, elders, or households, etc.

My internet friend Retha also wrote an important  blog post in response to Mary Kassian’s rather alarming article Sex in the Shadowlands.


Endnotes

[1] Ephesians 5:21-33 is about sacrificial love and mutual submission, and not about leadership. There are many words for leaders and leadership in the Greek language. These words are never used for husbands in the Greek NT. [More about Ephesians 5:22-33 here and here.]

[2] While I have yet to come across kephalē used with the meaning of “leader” or “authority” in original, untranslated Ancient Greek literature, that is not to say it never occurs. Its meaning of “leader”, however, must be considered as rare and atypical.

[3] Source, or origin, is one of the main contexts of 1 Corinthians 11:2ff (cf. 1 Cor. 11:12). Paul wanted the Christians in Corinth to know that men and women are mutually interdependent on each other and ultimately share the same source — God himself (1 Cor. 11:12). [More about 1 Corinthians 11:2-16 here.]


Related Articles

Kephalē and Male Headship  in Paul’s Letters
Kephalē and Proto-Gnosticism in Paul’s Letters
LSJ Definitions of Kephalē
Leon Morris on “Head” (Kephalē) in the New Testament
(1) Respect and Submission in 1 Peter 3:1-6
(2) Respect and Submission in 1 Peter 3:7-8
A Suitable Helper
The Chiasm in 1 Corinthians 11:2-16

Posted August 11th, 2012 . Categories/Tags: Christian Theology, Christology, Equality and Gender Issues, Equality in Marriage, , , , ,

Unkind, judgemental, bizarre, and off-topic comments will be deleted.

13 comments on “Who is the “head”?

  1. TL says:

    hey could you put that on the EC Blog too. This needs wide coverage. 🙂

  2. […] This article was first published at newlife.id.au […]

  3. Sarah says:

    Ignoring the theological faults in Kassian’s article, am I the only one who finds the graphic disgusting? I’m not immature about sexual topics, but how could anyone think that showing a visual of “Lord God” having sex with Jesus is a good idea? For someone who teaches modesty and complains of the way our culture treats sex, Kassian kind of puts it out there. Did no one who was close to her have the guts to say, “Maybe you’ve taken this analogy too far, you should reconsider your graphic?” Or are they so steeped in complementarian theology that they just accept articles like these with no questions? If I had to guess, I would guess that Kassian closed the comments because there was somewhat of a backlash with the theology and graphic in the article. I honestly hope and prayed that not a lot of non-christians see her diagram, it makes Christians seem pretty foolish.

  4. Marg says:

    I don’t think that Mary means to say that God has sex with Jesus, (or that elders have sex with members of the church community for that matter), and yet I can see that this could be a logical conclusion drawn from what she is trying to say.

    IMO I think her article is incredibly unwise anyway you look at it.

    I agree; it’s a shame no one close to her has pointed out the faults of her argument. But I am sure that many people from afar have; hence comments are closed.

  5. Cheryl Cope says:

    I appreciate people like you standing up for the truth even when it is “controversial”.

  6. Marg says:

    Thanks Cheryl. I think Mary is the one making controversial statements, statements that fall down when looked at logically and tested with Scripture. 😉

  7. Don Johnson says:

    That pic on Kassian’s site is certainly one of the STRANGEST pictures to come out of comp-land. It is also dead wrong, not being Scriptural, as pointed out in this blog. It is also does not even make sense in 1st century culture. That someone who some think is a Bible teacher can make such mistakes shows how strong the reality distortion field is when wearing the comp blue glasses. It is clear that Kassian does not even suspect how distorted her picture is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2009–2016   Margaret Mowczko | Powered by WordPress

More in Christian Theology, Christology
Paul’s Main Point in Ephesians 5:22-33

Ephesians 5:22-33 is written as a chiasm with the main point in the centre of the passage. We misinterpret Ephesians 5:22-33 if we...

Close