Learning to thrive in the new life Jesus offers us – 2 Corinthians 5:16-17

Gender Equality in Second Clement

Gender Equality in Second Clement

I’m reading through The Apostolic Fathers at the moment, a collection of Christian writings which date roughly from the late first century to the middle of the second century. I have previously commented on the subject of “mutual submission” in First Clement; today I’m looking at “gender equality” in Second Clement. But first, a bit of background information on the letter.

Second Clement is a sermon in the form of a letter. Dated at around 140-160 AD, it is “the oldest surviving complete Christian sermon outside of the New Testament.”[1]

I was inspired by the content of Second Clement, and found most of the teaching sound and timeless. However, its use was not widespread in the Early Church. Eusebius, the fourth century church historian, comments on this and writes, “But it must be observed also that there is said to be a second epistle of Clement. But we do not know that this is recognized like the former [First Clement], for we do not find that the ancients have made any use of it.” (Church History 3.38.4)[2]  It’s not known why Second Clement became connected with First Clement as the two works are dissimilar in style and content, and were certainly written by different authors. It is speculated, however, that both letters were originally found together in Corinth.[3]

The anonymous author of Second Clement alludes to numerous verses found in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and quotes many sayings from Jesus found in these gospels (e.g. Mark 2:17; Matt. 6:24; 7:21; 10:32; 16:26; Luke 16:10-12, etc). The author also seems to draw on material from 1 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Hebrews and 1 Peter, and he quotes a few verses from the Old Testament. He, or she, also uses texts taken from the apocryphal Gospel according to the Egyptians which does not survive.[4] It is thought that the following verses from chapter 12 of Second Clement quote and comment on a text taken from this Egyptian gospel.[5]

1Let us wait, therefore, hour by hour for the kingdom of God with love and righteousness, since we do not know the day of God’s appearing.  2For the Lord himself, when he was asked by someone when his kingdom was going to come, said: “When the two shall be one, and the outside like the inside, and the male with the female, neither male nor female.” 3Now “the two are one” when we speak the truth among ourselves and there is one soul in two bodies without deception [or, without hypocrisy]. 4And by “the outside like the inside” he means this: “the inside” signifies the soul, while “the outside” signifies the body.  Therefore just as your body is visible, so also let your soul be evident in good works. 5And by “the male with the female, neither male nor female” he means this: that when a brother sees a sister, he should not think of her as female, nor should she think of him as male. 6When you do these things, he says, the kingdom of God will come.
2 Clement chapter 12, taken from The Apostolic Fathers, The Greek Texts and English Translations (3rd edition) edited and translated by Michael W. Holmes (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic 2007) p.153.

I’m not exactly sure what to make of this particular passage in Second Clement. The teaching on gender equality is remarkable: “gender neutrality” might be a better description.

The fact that the author quotes verses from a lost apocryphal work here, and not from the Bible, does not help the case of so-called “biblical equality”.  Nor does the fact that the Gospel of Thomas (verse 22), which quotes the same passage from the Egyptian Gospel, was favoured by heterodox Gnostic Christians. However, unlike the Gospel of Thomas, the Christology of 2 Clement is sound.

Could there be any truth in this passage from 2 Clement? Is authenticity, transparency and no hint of gender discrimination in the body of Christ needed before the kingdom comes in its fullness?

Perhaps chapter 12 of Second Clement is simply evidence of a diversity of thinking on the place of women in the Post-Apostolic church. A comparison of First and Second Clement shows this diversity. The author of 1 Clement addressed his letter specifically to men, while the author of 2 Clement addresses both men and women; towards the end of 2 Clement this becomes explicit as both “brothers and sisters” (adelphoi kai adelphai) are implored to heed the same instructions (19:1; 20:2). 1 Clement implies that only men could be leaders in the church. 2 Clement implies that gender discrimination has no place in the body of Christ.

I do not regard Second Clement as Holy Scripture, but it is worth reading for its rich, high Christology and because it shows that in the early church, just as today, there were a variety of views on the place of women in the church.

[Older English translations of 2 Clement can be read online here.]


Endnote:

[1] The Apostolic Fathers, The Greek Texts and English Translations (3rd edition) edited and translated by Michael W. Holmes (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic 2007) p.132.

[2] Perhaps the use of 2 Clement was not widespread because its message of gender equality was unacceptable to the predominantly male church leaders, and inconsistent with the low view of women which was entrenched in broader society. [Here are some quotes from past Christian leaders which show their low view of women.]

[3] Second Clement survives alongside First Clement (and other writings) in two Greek manuscripts: Codex Alexandrinus (5th century) and Codex Hiersolymitanus (AD 1056), and in a Syriac translation collated with a New Testament manuscript dated AD 1169-1170.

[4] Two ancient works are called by the name The Gospel of the Egyptians. The one quoted in both Second Clement and the Gospel of Thomas was originally written in Greek, and should not be confused with the one originally written in Syriac.

The Gospel of the Egyptians was “written in Greek sometime after AD 150 and accepted as canonical in Egypt, its purpose was to promote doctrines held by the Encratites (such as rejection of marriage). Only a few fragments of the gospel have been preserved, chiefly by Clement of Alexandria [Stromata III. vi. 45; ix. 66; xiii. 92] . . . These sayings clearly demand sexual asceticism and the elimination of the sexual differences between male and female, a doctrine that is presented in other Gnostic writings from Egypt (see, e.g. Logia [i.e. sayings] 37 and 114 of the Gospel of Thomas.)  Bruce M. Metzger, The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origin, Development, and Significance (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987) p.vii.

[5] Chapter 12, and other passages, help to set the date of Second Clement at 140-160 AD, “for the quotation from the Apocryphal Gospel would not have been made after the four gospels of the New Testament obtained exclusive authority-towards the close of the second century” From Vol. VII., p. 515 of the Ante-Nicene Fathers. Furthermore, the author seems unaware of the complex Gnostic systems that became a huge threat to the church in the latter half of the second century. The absence of references to these heretical Gnostic systems also helps to date the letter. Some of Second Clement, however, especially the emphasis on the deity of Jesus (1:1) and the resurrection and judgement (9:1-5) seems to be a response to early Gnostic influences (10:5). Michael Holmes, Apostolic Fathers, p.132.  Kirsopp Lakes states that “The main object of the writer is to inculcate a high Christology, a pure life, and a belief in the resurrection of the flesh.” The Apostolic Fathers, Vol. 1, (London, 1912) pp. 125-127.

Further reading on 2 Clement here and here.


Related Articles

Mutual Submission in First Clement
Galatians 3:28 – Our Identity in Christ and in the Church
Equality and Unity in 1 Corinthians 12
“Equality” in Paul’s Letters
Gender Division Divides the Church
Complementarianism: A Traditional Belief of the Church?
A Thrill of Hope: Jesus’ First and Second Advents

Posted December 3rd, 2013 . Categories/Tags: Church History, Equality and Gender Issues, , ,

Unkind, judgemental, bizarre, and off-topic comments will be deleted.

16 comments on “Gender Equality in Second Clement

  1. Anne Vyn says:

    Very interesting material, Marg.
    Thanks for bringing 2 Clement to our attention.

  2. Kristen says:

    This is very interesting! I wonder how much the “don’t think of a brother as male/a sister as female” is related to the glorification of celibacy that occurred in the early church. Any thoughts on that?

  3. Marg says:

    Anne, my pleasure.

    Kristen, it might have something to do with it, but it doesn’t seem to be the author’s concern. He doesn’t mention virginity or celibacy, but then again he doesn’t mention marriage either.
    The Egyptian Gospel, however, where the “saying of Jesus” in 2 Clement 12 may have come from, did promote celibacy.

  4. […] In New Testament churches, gender does not seem to have been an important distinction among believers.  The only reason given for preserving gender distinctions in the church, in some situations, was for the sake of outsiders and for evangelism.[3]  But within the community of believers Paul tells us that we are not to regard each other according to the flesh (2 Cor. 5:16 cf 2 Clement 12). […]

  5. Thanks for bringing this forward, Marg. The letter reminds me of the Gospel of Thomas and gender roles, tho this seems even more egal. I wonder if it was connected to a Gnostic sect? If you know, I’d love to hear.

  6. Marg says:

    I don’t think the letter was connected with Gnosticism as the writer has beliefs that are clearly different to Gnostic beliefs, especially concerning the nature of Jesus Christ.

    The Christology of 2 Clement is hard to fault. So it makes me wonder whether Jesus might actually have said what is recorded in chapter 12. The author genuinely believes that s/he is quoting Jesus.

    John tells us that Jesus did many other things that were not recorded in his gospel and “If every one of them were written down, I suppose that even the whole world would not have room for the books that would be written” (John 21:25). No doubt Jesus also said many other things too.

  7. […] Marg Mowckzo on two of my favorite topics, Gender Equality in Second Clement. […]

  8. […] Our identity in Christ should have a direct influence on our relationships within the society, or community, of believers – the church. In New Testament churches, gender does not seem to have been an important distinction among believers. The only reason given for preserving gender distinctions in the church, in some situations, was for the sake of outsiders and for evangelism. But within the community of believers Paul tells us that we are not to regard each other according to the flesh (2 Cor. 5:16 cf 2 Clement 12). […]

  9. […] Unlike Paul’s letter to the Philippians, Clement’s letter seems to be especially addressed to the men (andres adelphoi) in the Corinthian church, and women are nowhere considered as Christian ministers in his letter.  The Didache (possibly written c. 100) also indicates that only men could be church leaders and ministers, including deacons, in the Post Apostolic period.  However the view on women in ministry was by no means homogeneous in the Post Apostolic Church.  For example, in 2 Clement, a letter-sermon written by an anonymous author in 150, both men and women are expressly addressed and gender equality is profoundly promoted (2 Clement chapter 12). […]

  10. […] Gender Equality in Second Clement […]

  11. […] Gender Equality in Second Clement […]

  12. […] Gender Equality in Second Clement […]

  13. […] This particular quotation is also found in several other surviving early Christian documents including Second Clement, a few of the non-biblical Acts of certain apostles, and the Gospel of Thomas. […]

  14. Christopher Kauffman says:

    Very interesting! I came out of Mennonite/Amish background where women were relegated to almost being the husbands servant. Ok, maybe that wasn’t strong enough. Almost relegated to being the husbands slave? To be fair, not in my lifetime because my dad left the Mennonite Church before I can remember. However, that’s what I have seen in many of the current Anabaptist lifestyles.

    The Holy Spirit is moving powerfully among these people! I have spent the last 4 years obsessed with learning and communing with the Holy Spirit, especially in Scripture. I only say this so that you understand where I am coming from with the nugget of revelation that I want to share 🙂 I really enjoy your articles and conversations in united love with God’s family.

    What I believe the Lord showed me from Paul’s word about “the one who is In Christ is a New Creation…” and “there is no longer male or female, Jew or Greek, bond or free…” is that Jesus’ New Covenant too mankind has given us the privileged ability to see each other as God sees us. Male and female = Gender, Jew and Greek = Ethnicity and Bond or free = Class. We shouldn’t focus on Gender, class or ethnicity but look for the New human/New Creation/Christ human in each other! Blessings!

    We are all re-created equal in Christ!

    • Marg says:

      I completely agree. While we can’t change our gender or ethnicity (class seems to be less of a consideration in western cultures) none of these things has any real significance in the New Creation.

      Right at the very top of each page on this website I have the text reference 2 Corinthians 5:16-17. Verses 15-17 say:

      And he died for all, that those who live should no longer live for themselves but for him who died for them and was raised again. So from now on we regard no one from a worldly (or fleshly) point of view. Though we once regarded Christ in this way, we do so no longer. Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, the new creation has come: The old has gone, the new is here!

      Our new life in Christ trumps all external social (worldly or fleshly) distinctions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2009–2016   Margaret Mowczko | Powered by WordPress

More in Church History, Equality and Gender Issues
Philip’s Prophesying Daughters

We tend to underestimate the ministry of Philip's four daughters; the early church writers didn't make that mistake. They recognised them as prophets...

Close