Learning to thrive in the new life Jesus offers us – 2 Corinthians 5:16-17

Kephalē and “Pre-Gnosticism” in Paul’s Letters

The Metaphorical Meanings of “Head” in Paul’s Letters: Part Two

Kephalē and "Proto-Gnosticism" in Paul's Letters

The Greek word kephalē has meanings other than its literal meaning of “head” and the metaphorical meanings of “source”, “origin”, or “beginning” given in Part One. Kephalē was also a Gnostic term.[1] Paul used the word in this sense in his letters to the churches in Colossae and Ephesus where an early form of Christian Gnosticism was developing.

Pre-Gnostic Heresies in the Colossian and Ephesian Churches

Christian Gnosticism developed into a highly complex belief system in the second century C.E. and was a serious threat to the Church at that time, but an “incipient Gnosticism”, as F.F. Bruce called it,[2] was already beginning to develop in some New Testament churches in the latter part of the first century, most notably in the church at Colossae.

At Colossae in Asia Minor Paul met with a grave heresy, a syncretistic amalgam of Christianity with theosophical elements drawn partly from the mystery cults and partly from heterodox Judaism. The Colossian Christians were being persuaded to worship intermediate angelic powers, identified with heavenly bodies, and believed to possess a power to determine human fate unbroken by the Gospel.
Henry Chadwick, The Early Church, The Penguin History of the Church, Vol. 1 (Penguin Books, 1993) 34.

Paul described the heresy in Colossae as a “hollow and deceptive philosophy, which depends on human tradition and the elemental spiritual forces of this world” (Col. 2:8 cf. Col. 2:4, 18). Gnostics believed that they alone had wisdom (sophia) and knowledge (gnōsis). Paul stated, however, that true wisdom and knowledge are hidden in Christ (Col. 2:3).

A pre-Gnostic heresy was also being taught in the church at Ephesus.[3] Paul addressed aspects of this heresy in his letters to Timothy. Timothy was caring for the church at Ephesus at that time.[4]

In contrast to the Gnostic-like heresies, Paul taught that Jesus is the fullness of deity in bodily form, emphasising Jesus’ divinity and humanity (Col. 2:9). Paul emphasised Jesus’ divinity so that the Colossians and Ephesians would realise that Jesus was not just one of numerous angelic or celestial powers (or aeons) between mankind and God, but that Jesus Christ created all these celestial powers and authorities (Col. 1:16), and is seated in the heavenly realms supreme over all cosmic forces (Eph. 1:20-23).

Paul also stressed Jesus’ humanity because of a Gnostic belief that Jesus did not really have a human body of flesh and blood but only seemed to have had a human body (Col. 2:9; 1 Tim. 2:5).[5] Furthermore, Paul addressed ascetic practices that were a characteristic of some sects of Gnosticism (Col. 2:22-23; 1 Tim. 4:3).

Kephalē and Gnosticism

Paul addressed pre-Gnostic heresies using terms and concepts that the early Christian Gnostics would have understood. Kephalē (head) was a term used in Gnosticism. In the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, H. Schlier gives an insight into the Gnostic concept of kephalē.

In Hellenistic and Gnostic circles the word [kephalē] acquires a special sense in connection with the aeon and primal man. The cosmic aeon embraces the totality of all things in its head and body. In Gnosticism the divine aeon becomes primal man embracing the substance of the cosmos, but also redeemer man embracing the remaining substance of the fallen world. Primal man, who bears the cosmos, recovers from the fall as redeemer man, who gathers the cosmos to himself. In this scheme the kephalē is both apart from (and superior to) the body but also in unity with it. Elements of this view may be seen in Philo’s commentary on Exodus where the logos is the kephalē which rules the cosmos and in which the cosmos finds its fullness. Gnostic texts are more complicated but in various combinations contain the idea of primal man and/or redeemer man as the kephalē (sometimes equated with Christ.)[6]

Putting 1 Corinthians 11:3 aside, which was dealt with in the previous article, the only places where Jesus is referred to as kephalē are in a few verses contained in Paul’s letters to the Ephesians and the Colossians. (My use of underlines in the following verses.)

And He put all things in subjection under His feet, and gave Him as head over all things to the church, which is His body, the fullness of Him who fills all in all (Eph 1: 22-23 NASB).

. . . but speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in all aspects into Him who is the head, even Christ, from whom the whole body, being fitted and held together by what every joint supplies, according to the proper working of each individual part, causes the growth of the body for the building up of itself in love (Eph. 4:16-17 NASB).

He is also head of the body, the church; and He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, so that He Himself will come to have first place in everything. For it was the Father’s good pleasure for all the fullness to dwell in Him (Col. 1:18-19 NASB).

For in Him all the fullness of Deity dwells in bodily form, and in Him you have been made complete, and He is the head over* all rule and authority (Col. 2:9-10 NASB). [*There is no word for “over” in the Greek of this verse. “Over” is added as an interpretation.]

Let no one keep defrauding you of your prize by delighting in self-abasement and the worship of the angels, taking his stand on visions he has seen, inflated without cause by his fleshly mind, and not holding fast to the head, from whom the entire body, being supplied and held together by the joints and ligaments, grows with a growth which is from God (Col. 2:18-19 NASB).

The last passage, especially, is a clear warning against several heretical ideas found in Gnosticism: self-abasement, worship of angels, special revelations through visions. In the other passages Paul uses the word kephalē to explain that Jesus is the creator and supreme fullness of the cosmos. (See Eph. 1:19-23 and Col. 1:15-19). Importantly, Paul used the word plērōma (fullness) which was also an important word in the heresy of Christian Gnosticism (Eph. 1:19; Col. 1:19 ). He described Jesus as the plērōma to distinguish Jesus from being considered as just another aeon or celestial power by the Proto-Gnostics.

Plērōma is a technical term for the totality of the 30 aeons. This totality is closest to God but is his product; he stands over it.  The plērōma is the surpreme spiritual world from which Jesus comes and into which the spiritual enter. Implied in the term are the fullness and perfection of being.[7]

Despite the enigmatic and negative association of kephalē and plērōma with Gnosticism, Paul used these terms to teach that the church as the “body” on earth must hold on to Jesus Christ as the “head” in the heavenly realms, and grow up into his fullness and perfection (Eph. 4:13; 3:19).

Robert Banks on the Body Metaphor in Ephesians and Colossians

In chapter 6 of his book, Paul’s Idea of Community, Robert Banks looks at the Christian community as a functioning body. Banks differentiates between Paul’s use of the body metaphor in his early letters, especially 1 Corinthians, to that in his later letters of Ephesians and Colossians. Banks notes that:

“In Paul’s later writings certain developments in his use of the “body” metaphor may be found. These arise from the different situations encountered by the communities. Religious ideas from a number of sources—Greek, Jewish, and Oriental—have coalesced and threaten to penetrate the small Christian enclaves. According to these foreign ideas various cosmic powers, which are themselves emanations of divinity, can assist people in their contact with God. This being so, believers need to supplement their reliance upon Christ by gaining an acquaintance with such powers.”[8]

Banks does not identify this heresy as a form of Gnosticism, even though his description of the heresy describes an incipient Gnosticism, very well.

A few pages later Banks does comment on Gnosticism and writes that, “Gnostic thought recognizes the idea of the saved community as the body of the heavenly redeemer but only in writings that are later than the NT.” However, Paul was already alert to the way the pre-Gnostics were using the head-body metaphor, and, using their own terms, Paul brought correction.

Conclusion

Many English-speaking Christians believe that the metaphorical meaning of “head” (kephalē) in the New Testament is perfectly plain and obvious. This is simply not true. Paul used the word “head” in ways that are very different to how we use it today in English. Apart from its literal meaning, “head” had different metaphorical meanings which include “source”, “beginning” and “origin” in Koine Greek. But it only rarely had the metaphorical meaning of “leader” or “authority”, and these few instances are generally in translations into Greek, rather than in works originally written in Greek.[9]

In verses about Jesus Christ, it seems that Paul sometimes used kephalē in a Gnostic sense. Admittedly, the Gnostic sense of the word is enigmatic and baffling for most of us who only have a slight knowledge of their complicated beliefs. Keeping in mind the different ways the word kephalē was used in the Greek world, we need to be cautious about how we, today, understand the use of kephalē in the New Testament.


Endnotes

[1] See the meanings of kephalē given in section V.2 (and V.3) in the LSJ Greek Lexicon here.

[2] F.F. Bruce, Paul: Apostle of the Heart Set Free (Grand Rapids: Wm B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1999) 261.

[3] In Against the Valentinians, chapter 3, Tertullian identified the false teaching at Ephesus as an early form of Gnosticism. Tertullian described and denounced this heresy using Paul’s own expression of “myths and endless geneologies” (1 Tim. 1:4), and he added “which the inspired apostle [Paul] by anticipation condemned, whilst the seeds of heresy were even then shooting forth.”

Ireneaus also identified the false teaching at Ephesus as Gnosticism. Irenaeus (c 115–202) wrote a five-volumed work (c 180) in which he identified and refuted several strains of Gnosticism. This work is commonly called Against Heresies; however its true title is: On the Detection and Overthrow of the Falsely-called Knowledge (gnōsis). (My emphasis.) Irenaeus copied Paul’s expression from 1 Timothy 6:20 exactly, “falsely-called knowledge”, for the title.  This work opens with Irenaus remarking on “endless geneologies”, a phrase copied from 1 Timothy 1:4.

[4]  The letter to the Ephesians was probably written as a circular letter, and intended to be read in several churches in Asia Minor. That is, it was probably not originally addressed specifically to the Ephesian churches. If the letter was a circular letter then proto-Gnosticism would have been fairly widespread in Asia Minor at the time the letter was written.  The letters to the seven churches in Revelation chapters 2 and 3 seem to confirm this.

[5] 1 Timothy 2:5 addresses a Gnostic belief termed Docetism, which is that Jesus Christ did not really come in a human body of flesh, but only seemed to be human.

[6] H. Schlier, “Kephalē” in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, eds Gerard Kittle and Gerard Friedrich, abridged by Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1985) 429.

[7] G. Dellingin, “Plērōma” in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, eds Gerard Kittle and Gerard Friedrich, abridged by Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1985) 870.

[8] Robert Banks, Paul’s Idea of Community: The Early House Churches in their Cultural Setting (Peabody: Hendrickson, 2004) (source)

[9] The few instances where kephalē means “leader” are in Koine Greek translations, such as severalinstances in the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Hebrew Old Testament),  rather than in original Greek literature.


Related Articles

(Part 1) Kephalē and “Male Headship” in Paul’s Letters
LSJ Definitions of Kephalē
1 Timothy 2:12 – The Heresy in the Ephesian Church
Gnosticism: The “Deep Things of Satan”
Adam and Eve in Gnostic Literature and 1 Timothy 2:13-14
Bible Women with Spiritual Authority
The Fullness of Christ

Posted November 24th, 2011 . Categories/Tags: Equality and Gender Issues, Equality in Marriage, , , , ,

Unkind, judgemental, bizarre, and off-topic comments will be deleted.

12 comments on “Kephalē and “Pre-Gnosticism” in Paul’s Letters

  1. […] Paul also used the word kephalē (head) to show that the church, the body, was closely allied and had an affinity with Jesus Christ, the head.  More on this in the next article The Gnostic Concept of Kephalē in Paul’ Letters. […]

  2. […] Kephalē and Proto-Gnosticism in Paul’Letters […]

  3. […] Here I’ve written down some of my findings on the use of “head” (kephalē) in Paul’s letters.  This article answers the question: Does Paul’s statement that the husband is the head of the wife in Ephesians 5:23 mean that the husband has primacy, leadership or authority over his wife? [1300 words, plus lots of endnotes for those who want to fact-check.] Part two, Kephalē and Proto-Gnosticism in Paul’s Letters, is here. […]

  4. […] Kephale and Proto-Gnosticism in Paul’s Letters […]

  5. […] Kephale and Proto-Gnosticism in Paul’s Letters […]

  6. […] Personal Greeting to Women Ministers (1) Kephalē and Male Headship in Paul’s Letters (2) Kephalē and Proto-Gnosticism in Paul’s Letters LSJ Definitions of Kephalē  Who is the Head? The Difficult […]

  7. […] Kephalē and Proto-Gnosticism in Paul’s Letters […]

  8. Chris Gerard says:

    Paul wrote Colossians to combat gnostic heresy. Oh really? Who told you that… an orthodox teacher or Catholic encyclopedia? Tell me. Were the Colossians Jews? No, they were Gnostics. Thedeus who was taught by Paul, in turn taught Valentinus, who taught Heracleon and Ptolemy. This is the only credible Apostolic succession we have of St. Paul (as noted by Clement of Alexandria and Origen). We know nothing of the legacy of Titus and Timothy (Titus “left on Crete” and Timothy always traveling… how convenient… and where are their writings?). Heracleon in his day complained that his group were the only ones left teaching Paul and Church history proves him correct until finally Augustine and then Martin Luther (both hated by the orthodoxy). Orthodoxy has never liked Paul and Paul has never liked orthodoxy. One thing is certain… Thedeus, Valentinus, Heracleon, and Ptolemy would sharply disagree with your view of Paul’s purpose in writing to the Gnostics (oh excuse me, I meant to say the Colossians).

    What’s really sad though is that we now know… finally, that Marcion was correct and St. Ireneaus was wrong!

    Christopher Gerard

  9. Marg says:

    Hi Chris, my article clearly acknowledges where I got my information from: F.F. Bruce, Henry Chadwick, H. Schlier, G. Dellingin, Robert Banks, and most importantly from Paul’s letter to the Colossians itself. I don’t think that any of these men identify as Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox.

    Also, I certainly do not agree with everything that Ireneaus has said.

  10. […] Kephalē and “Proto-Gnosticism” in Paul’s Letters […]

  11. […] (Part 2) Kephalē and “Proto-Gnosticism” in Paul’s Letters […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2009–2016   Margaret Mowczko | Powered by WordPress | Theme by Keep2theCode

More in Equality and Gender Issues, Equality in Marriage
Stephanas or Stephana: Man or Woman?

Some people, aware that the feminine gender of Junia and Nympha has been obscured in the past, speculate that Stephanas (1 Cor. 1:16;...

Close