Learning to thrive in the new life Jesus offers us – 2 Corinthians 5:16-17

What must a woman do to be saved? (1 Tim. 2:15)

Yet she will be saved through childbearing, provided they continue in faith and love and holiness, with modesty. 1 Timothy 2:15 NRSV

1 Timothy 2:15 is a difficult verse to interpret. One of the more disturbing interpretations of this verse is that women cannot be saved unless they have children. I have heard several well-known ministers teach this faulty interpretation.[1] For example, Jim Hamilton, (an associate professor of biblical theology at the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and a preaching pastor at a Baptist Church in the USA) has stated that “All Women must embrace their role as women by bearing children and, if they do this in faith, they will then be saved.” (Bold added.)

I challenged Jim on this and he responded, “Well, read 1 Tim 2:15—Paul isn’t contradicting Jesus.”

I have no idea what Jim meant by this. I’m aware of what Paul said in 1 Timothy 2:15, but Jesus never said anything at all about women having to have kids in order to be saved.

What did Jesus say to women?

What must a woman do to be saved? (1 Tim. 2:15)On one occasion Jesus had the opportunity to affirm the “virtue” of motherhood. A woman in the crowd cried out and said to him, “Blessed is the mother who gave you birth and nursed you.” Jesus replied, however, “Blessed rather are those who are hearing the word of God and obeying it” (Luke 11:27–28 NIV). In no way did Jesus indicate that being a mother was the necessary, or only, way women can obey God’s word.[2]

In his conversation with a Samaritan woman—the longest conversation between Jesus and an individual recorded in the gospels—Jesus does not broach the subject of motherhood. Instead, he and the woman have a long theological discussion about true worship, during which, Jesus offers the woman the gift of Living Water (John 4:4). It is not recorded that Jesus offered this gift with the proviso that she embrace her role as a woman.

Mary and Martha of Bethany, good friends of Jesus, may have been ascetics. If so, they would have been unmarried and childless. When Mary sat at Jesus’ feet learning from him, was he teaching her about the necessity of being a mother in order to be saved? When Jesus later had a theological discussion with Martha about the resurrection and eternal life did he insist that Martha embrace her womanhood in order to receive eternal life?  (John 11:25-27).  I don’t think so.

Jesus and Paul Contradict Jim

By saying that “All women must embrace their role as women and bear children, and if they do so in faith they will be saved” Jim is effectively adding a clause to the gospel.

The gospel message I know is that Jesus died for our sins and rose again. And that, if we put our trust in Jesus as Savior and faithfully follow him as Lord, we—both men and women—share in his eternal life. This is the gospel message: the message of salvation.

I don’t recall any New Testament author, including Paul, saying or implying, “Oh, and by the way, women must embrace their role as women and have children if they want to be saved because Jesus’ blood spilled on the cross isn’t enough to save you” (cf. 1 Cor. 15:1ff).

Paul does not contradict Jesus. That is because neither Paul nor Jesus connect salvation with gender or supposed gender roles. I believe that Jim has misunderstood Paul’s meaning and intention in 1 Timothy 2:15. [More on this verse here.]

What about childless women?

In 1 Corinthians 7:34, Paul says that singleness is a better state than marriage for people who want to serve the Lord with undivided devotion. But if having kids is how women are saved, how will single and childless Christian women be saved? Jim bears the childless women in mind and adds yet another caveat to the gospel: “This doesn’t mean that single women or barren women can’t be saved, but they should by faith embrace what it means for them to be women.” (Bold added.)

It is easy for the majority of people to embrace their sex, as our sex is an intrinsic part of who we are. As a female I know what it is to be female. I don’t even need faith to embrace what it means to be a woman—I just am a woman! Being a woman is not a defining role, however, as there are many varied roles that godly women can take. The Bible shows us that women were involved in all sorts activities, ministries, and life situations. Many of these Bible women were not defined by their marital status, or whether or not they had children. [More on this here.]

The gospel of Jesus has no gender bias

There is something very wrong with a gospel message that has a gender bias, where faith in Jesus Christ’s redemptive work is not enough for women, and they are required to negotiate extra “ifs” and “buts” that apply only to them. Moreover, it is unsound to alter the gospel to make it fit with a faulty interpretation of one single Bible verse, namely 1 Timothy 2:15.

Paul warned about people who try and pervert the gospel of Christ:

I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting the one who called you to live in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—which is really no gospel at all. Evidently some people are throwing you into confusion and are trying to pervert the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse! As we have already said, so now I say again: If anybody is preaching to you a gospel other than what you accepted, let them be under God’s curse! Galatians 1:6-8


Endnote

[1] Jim’s article is two years old, but I would think that if he had changed his mind on this topic he would have taken down his post. His post is here. Other complementarians, such as Bruce Ware, hold to similar views. John MacArthur implies in this video that the only redemptive act women can perform is having godly offspring. He seems to have forgotten that we do not need to redeem ourselves. Jesus has redeemed both men and women with his redemptive act on the Cross.

[2] Procreating is a joint responsibility. The command to be fruitful and multiply was given to both men and women (Gen. 1:27-28); it is not the sole responsibility of women.

[3] Here is my paraphrase of 1 Timothy 2:15: “But she [possibly the woman addressed in 1 Tim. 2:11-12] will be preserved through the bearing of children if they [her and the man of 1 Tim. 2:12] continue in faith and love and sanctity and self- restraint.”

Paul’s real meaning here was that he wanted the Christian women of Ephesus to know that getting married and having children would not jeopardise their salvation. Paul associates moral purity with childbearing because some people in the Ephesian church were forbidding marriage and teaching that celibacy was a necessary moral virtue (cf. 1 Tim. 4:3a). Paul encourages the women to get married and have children, which they couldn’t do if they held to the false ideal of virginity and celibacy (cf. 1 Tim 5:14). (More on this here.)

© 23rd of June 2013, Margaret Mowczko

An abridged version of this article was published by Christians for Biblical Equality (International) in their Arise e-newsletter on the 25th of July 2013.  (Arise archives)

Image Credit: “Mary holding the Child Jesus before starry blue background” © mammuth (iStock)


Related Articles

Chastity, Salvation, and 1 Timothy 2:15
1 Timothy 2:12 in Context

1 Timothy 2:13-15 – The Creation and Salvation of Women
Beauty, Marriage, Motherhood and Ministry

Is motherhood the highest calling for women?
Busy at Home: How does Titus 2:4-5 apply today?
Working Women in the New Testament
Gender Obsessions: Emphasizing our Differences or Similarities?
25 Biblical Roles for Biblical Women
Instant Christianity
Becoming a Christian

Posted June 23rd, 2013 . Categories/Tags: Equality and Gender Issues, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Unkind, judgemental, bizarre, and off-topic comments will be deleted.

19 comments on “What must a woman do to be saved? (1 Tim. 2:15)

  1. Karin says:

    The Bible says believers put on Christ (Rom. 13,14; Gal. 3,27); it doesn’t say there is a pink and a blue version of the Christ garment.

  2. Marg says:

    I agree completely, Karin.

  3. Sarah says:

    This is a great article, thanks Marg!

  4. Marg says:

    Thanks Sarah. 🙂

  5. J. Stahl says:

    Thank you for this. I’ve shared it.

  6. Robyn says:

    Anyone who adds a single requirement of salvation, save grace, preaches heresy. Period.

  7. TL says:

    1 Tim. 2:15 is more often quoted ignorantly making it out to be heresy than it is quoted responsibly. As you point out women do not have a different route to salvation than men do.

    It is of note that after Christ was born, women are no longer praised in Scripture for bearing children. Why? In the OT the promise was that the Messiah would come through the seed of a woman. All of God’s people looked for the birth of the Messiah. After Christ was born, lived, died and resurrected, it was done. Now, all of God’s people should be looking for how men and women can live after the example of the Messiah. That is God’s gift to us through Christ’s great sacrifice and the empowerment of the Holy Spirit given to all who believe if we continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.

  8. Marg says:

    Robyn, for sure!

    TL, It amazes me that many serious Bible teachers suddenly forget the basics of Salvation when they read 1 Tim 2:15, and they try to make this single verse fit in, somehow, with the gospel.

    These teachers are reading too much into the verb sōzō (which means save, deliver, keep safe, preserve, or make well, etc) and making this single verse apply to all women, everywhere, rather than recognizing that Paul is addressing a local problem and a local heresy that forbade marriage, and therefore having children (1 Tim 4:3a).

    I suggest that Paul’s real meaning here was that he wanted the Christian women of Ephesus to know that getting married and having children would not jeopardise their Salvation. Paul associates moral purity with childbearing because some people in the Ephesian church were forbidding marriage and teaching that celibacy was a necessary moral virtue (1 Timothy 4:3a). Paul wanted to encourage women to have children, which they couldn’t do if they held to the Artemissian ideal of virginity and celibacy. Different strains of Gnosticism emphasised either sexual licentiousness or abstinence. Paul’s teaching in 1 Timothy 2:15, in effect, cleverly corrects both extremes. [From here.]

    I agree that our main responsibility is to live our lives by following Jesus’ example. The earth has been populated; the command in Genesis 1 to “be fruitful and multiply” has been fulfilled. Perhaps Christians should focus on taking better care of the people who are already on earth, rather than encouraging marriage and motherhood as the primary calling for women.

    I also think it’s warped to say that women have a greater responsibility than men to have children. Having children is a joint responsibility and blessing.

  9. anonymous says:

    This is a difficult passage, perhaps the most strange one in the NT. A Japanese non-Christian asked me what it means. In this post, so far you have explained what it does NOT mean. I already know that, and I explained that to her. But can you please offer your interpretation of what it DOES mean? How can we equalitarians interpret this responsibly? What statement can we make about its contents rather than about what it doesn’t contain? It would be extremely helpful if you can provide an answer to this, or point me to one.

  10. Marg says:

    Anonymous, It is indeed a strange verse in a difficult passage.

    I attempt to provide an explanation of the meaning of 1 Timothy 2:15 in my series on 1 Timothy 2:12 in Context. The series begins here: http://newlife.id.au/equality-and-gender-issues/1-timothy-212-in-context-1/

  11. […] Stephen Um says it is the husband’s role to sanctify his bride and make her presentable before Christ. If this is correct (and it’s not) that means that unmarried women cannot be sanctified. [Another wrong teaching of some Complementarians is addressed in my article What must a woman do to be saved?] The Bible teaches that Jesus himself, is the Saviour and Sanctifier of men and women; and he presents the Church to himself. This is the main point of Ephesians 5:22-33.
    […]

  12. […] 1 Timothy 2 also discusses the salvation of women in “childbearing” (v.15).  Jerome believed that women literally received salvation in Christ by bearing children.6  His belief utterly contradicts the New Testament gospel message of salvation by grace through faith in Jesus Christ alone. Most Christians today reject his interpretation of childbirth, but for some reason continue to uphold his interpretation about women in the church. (More on “saved through childbearing” here.) […]

  13. […] [5] Different Bible versions translate this verb as “be preserved” (NASB), “be saved” (NIV) or “kept safe”.  While this verb can refer to Salvation, it is also used in other parts of the New Testament to simply mean physical health and wholeness.  [My article What must a woman do to be saved? here.] […]

  14. […] What must a woman do to be saved? […]

  15. […] What must a woman do to be saved? (1 Timothy 2:15) […]

  16. […] What must a women do to be saved (1 Timothy 2:15) […]

  17. […] role as women by bearing children and, if they do this in faith, they will then be saved.” (Read Marg’s post on Hamilton’s position here.) What does it say about the integrity of your biblical interpretation if you single this one verse […]

  18. […] What must a woman do to be saved? (1 Timothy 2:15) […]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

© 2009–2016   Margaret Mowczko | Powered by WordPress

More in Equality and Gender Issues
Three obscure Old Testament women with clout

Ever heard of Sera, Aksah or Sheerah? I hadn't . . . not until I decided to read through the Old Testament, slowly,...

Close