Primarily because of one Bible verse, 1 Timothy 2:12, many churches do not permit women to preach or teach when there are men present. 1 Timothy 2:12 has been interpreted and applied by these churches as effectively prohibiting all women from teaching any man for all time, especially on the topic of theology.
Many of these churches believe that Paul gave this prohibition because women are (supposedly) more susceptible to deception than men. They base this view on 1 Timothy 2:13-14 where Paul says that “it was the woman who was deceived”. Yet the Scriptures never actually state or show that women in general are more likely to be deceived than men.
Churches which do not allow women to preach or teach in a church service where many people can hear and assess what is being taught—including men who (supposedly) are less likely to be deceived than women, often allow women to teach young impressionable children in situations where, typically, very few adults can hear and assess what is being taught. These same churches also often allow women to teach other women.
If these churches truly believe the reason why women should not teach men is because women are more easily deceived, logic would suggest that women should not be trusted to teach vulnerable children and other, supposedly gullible, women. Yet many women are trusted and even encouraged to teach children and other women, but remain barred from teaching grown men. This simply doesn’t make sense. Surely Paul was suggesting something other than the idea of “female deception” when he brought Adam and Eve into his first letter to Timothy in 2:13-14.
I do not think that the real reason Paul restricted a woman from teaching and domineering a man in the Ephesian church was because women are more easily deceived than men, or because the first woman Eve was deceived. As I have stated in my series on 1 Timothy 2:12, I believe that Paul mentioned Adam and Eve to correct a false teaching that was circulating in the Ephesian church which claimed that Eve was created first and Adam was the one deceived. There are several Gnostic texts which state this false, topsy-turvy thinking. (Early church fathers Irenaeus and Tertullian quoted from 1 Timothy and identified the heresy in Ephesus as a form of Gnosticism.)
Furthermore, the word “to teach”, in 1 Timothy 2:12, is tied to the word authentein which may mean “to domineer” but could refer to something more sinister. This is a very important consideration. Paul was not writing about sound teaching in his prohibition. He was writing about teaching done in an overbearing or unsound manner. Moreover, Paul’s instructions were written in response to a particular problem in a particular congregation.
If Paul’s prohibition was meant to be universal and timeless then the implication is that no woman, ever, has anything of spiritual significance to teach any man. I am dismayed that some Christians actually think this way and are perpetuating the dogma that women are not permitted to teach in church services when there are men present. I do not believe that Paul’s prohibition in 1 Timothy 2:12 was universal and timeless. I do not believe that Paul’s intent was to institute a dogma which restricts capable Christian women from teaching in any setting or situation.
 It is unwise for churches to make strong doctrinal statements based on just one or two Scripture verses.
 In the Genesis account, Eve thinks about the serpent’s advice before being ultimately deceived; whereas Adam seems to take the fruit without hesitation or thought (Genesis 3:1-6). Surely, being impulsive and thoughtless are undesirable traits in church leaders. Yet men are not stereotyped with these qualities to the same degree that women are associated with the trait of deception. Why is that?
 In the New Testament, “preaching” refers to the public proclamation of the Gospel message rather than the Biblical teaching and exposition that usually occurs in a church meeting.
 There is no reason to assume that the prohibition in 1 Timothy 2:12 is referring to a church service setting. Much of the behaviour that Paul addresses throughout 1 Timothy is not limited to church service settings, but refers to everyday Christian behaviours of the church community in Ephesus.
 Titus 2:3-5 is used by some Christians to affirm that women can teach other women; however this verse is not about doctrinal or biblical teaching. [More on Titus 2:3-5 here.]
 Paul wrote 1 Timothy when Timothy was working as an evangelist at Ephesus. One of the main reasons Paul wrote this letter was to give Timothy advice about how to deal with the problem of an early form of Gnostic false teaching (cf. 1 Tim 1:3-4, 6:20-21).
 A further implication of this faulty dogma is that the most ill informed, spiritually immature man has more rights to teach in church services than the most well informed, godly women
© 18th of February, 2011; Margaret Mowczko
This post by Laura Ziesel is excellent: http://www.lauraziesel.com/2011/10/deceived-shall-teach-our-children.html
Women, Eve and Deception
The Portrayal of Women in the Bible
1 Timothy 2:12 in Context
Questions about how to implement 1 Timothy 2:12
Why 1 Timothy 2:12 and 1 Corinthians 14:34 are not timeless regulations
Bible Women with Spiritual Authority
Did Priscilla Teach Apollos?
Paul’s Qualifications for Church Leaders
New Testament Women Church Leaders
Interpretations and Applications of 1 Corinthians 14:34-35